Thursday, 7 February 2013


Noor Jahangir, author of The Changeling King, has written a review of The Emerald Forge, rating it 4/5 stars: "The characters are unique and immediately iconic, as is the author’s style which sets this book apart from other dystopian tales written in the past twenty years."

Friday, 21 December 2012

Solstice promotion

Happy Solstice! To celebrate, and as a promotional offer for the recent publication of The Emerald Forge, the electronic edition of Pilgrennon's Beacon is available to download free on Amazon from the 21st to the 25th. You can read this format on your smartphone, computer, tablet, etc. by downloading a free Kindle app. 

Click for link to the UK and the US.  

Caught in a feud between the two greatest minds of her time, Dana must reach the distant beacon to uncover the dark secrets of her past.

Dana Provine is a girl with mild autism and a secret ability to mentally control computers, who runs away from bullies at her school in Coventry after a hospital scan reveals an object lodged in her brain. A compelling signal leads her north to the Outer Hebrides and an abandoned military facility on the remote and supposedly haunted Flannan Isles, where she hopes to untangle the mystery shrouding her birth and her missing parents. But as the lies of the past unfold, Dana unwittingly finds herself under the scrutiny of a government supercomputer with the power to destroy everything she knows... 

This e-Edition includes an excerpt from the sequel, deleted scenes, and some other bonus material not available in the paperback version.

Wednesday, 12 December 2012


Book 2 of Pilgrennon's Children, The Emerald Forge, releases today:

Who is the boy spying on Dana? Who is the girl imprisoned in her dreams?

Following the Information Terrorism attack on London, a radical new government has risen to power. The world is changing, but so far as it concerns Dana Provine, an unusual autistic girl growing up in an unforgiving society, everyday life is much the same. When Dana is troubled by disturbing dreams about a hospital, and a boy from school who seems to know far too much about the past starts following her, it’s just two more problems on top of many. But when she encounters a bizarre construct, half beast, half machine, she realises something dangerous is going on that could affect everyone. The answer she seeks could confirm both her greatest hope and her deepest fear: that Ivor Pilgrennon still lives.
There are a few ways you can get a copy. You can walk into a bookshop of your choice and order the trade paperback, in which case you'll need the ISBN number, 978-0-9566080-7-9. Amazon hasn't yet updated the page to show the book as available, but you can (or should soon be able to) order it in the UK US. Alternatively, you can download it from Amazon in the .prc electronic format that you can read on a smartphone or computer with a free Kindle app.

Thursday, 20 September 2012

The Emerald Forge

The Emerald Forge, book two in the Pilgrennon's Children series, will hopefully be published this December. Here is a preview of the cover in its latest incarnation.

Who is the boy spying on Dana? Who is the girl imprisoned in her dreams? 

Following the Information Terrorism attack on London, a radical new government has risen to power. The world is changing, but so far as it concerns Dana Provine, an unusual autistic girl growing up in an unforgiving society, everyday life is much the same.

When Dana is troubled by disturbing dreams about a hospital, and a boy from school who seems to know far too much about the past starts following her, it's just two more problems on top of many. But when she encounters a bizarre construct, half beast, half machine, she realises something dangerous is going on that could affect everyone. The answer she seeks could confirm both her greatest hope and her deepest fear: that Ivor Pilgrennon still lives.

Thursday, 5 January 2012

The Trouble with ABNA

The time of year for the ABNA contest is once more fast approaching. On the whole, this contest is a great opportunity to obtain feedback on your work (and a chance at a prestigious prize) and I would recommend it if you have a book in a suitably edited condition. However, last year I had various problems with the contest and the book I entered (Pilgrennon’s Beacon, published through my own company) which I’m going to talk about in this post.

For anyone reading who doesn’t know, the Amazon Breakthrough Novel Award is organised between big publisher Penguin, a magazine called Publishers ‘no apostrophe’ Weekly, big bookseller Amazon, and a company owned by Amazon called Createspace. Createspace is a subsidy publisher/ PoDer and distributor that describes itself using the somewhat oxymoronic term ‘self-publishing service’. The contest is for any novels in the categories Adult and Young Adult, with the specification that the entries must either be unpublished or published in such a way that the author controls the rights (i.e. self published). The winners in these two categories each win a publishing contract with Penguin.

All well and good so far. The books go through three rounds of reviews, and if you make it into the quarterfinals or higher, they post the reviews on an Amazon product page where members of the public can download an excerpt from the book in the Kindle format. This is where it gets problematic. Last year in the quarterfinals I found that the sample download replaced my book’s actual Kindle product in searches and on the paperback’s page. What was even worse was that in the UK people had to pay to download these ‘free’ samples. I sincerely hope nobody paid to download the contest sample of my book thinking it was the actual book. The other big problem was that comments from the reviews that appeared in the item description of this downloadable sample product overwrote the official publisher’s description of the book in all other formats. This meant that someone browsing the book in Amazon would see two abbreviated opinions about a sample in a contest rather than a tagline, description, and select reviews.

The bogus Kindle edition persisted until my entry was eliminated in the semifinals. The product description overwrite was stuck there for months and months, and I sent a string of complaints to Amazon asking them to restore the item descriptions to their publisher settings. I had various replies that ranged from them saying it had been done and the change would appear in the next 24 hours (which it didn’t) to them claiming it was impossible to remove from my own products because the review was sanctioned by Amazon. This culminated in Amazon closing the case and refusing to respond to my emails. About a month later, when I’d lost all hope of my book’s page not being a trainwreck resulting from a competition I’d entered, it inexplicably reverted back to the publisher’s description. This cost me a great deal of inconvenience and annoyance, and my sales in these months were lower than the earlier months when the correct item description had been shown.

Anyway, more about these reviews. At the second round, each entrant receives two reviews from Amazon customers (random Amazon customers who write prolific reviews and who’ve been invited and get some freebies for their time). Great! Opinions from Real Readers! If you get nice reviews, you might even consider adding them to your book’s description (below the publisher’s description, of course). The reviews are usually fair and objective, and when I’ve entered the contest I’ve (touch wood) so far not had a bad one, but keep in mind they are from random members of the public, some of whom may not be interested in books generally or the particular genre of any book they happen to get to review.

There's a big element of pot luck as you don’t know who is going to review your excerpt. One person told me on a private forum that in one of her reviews, the reviewer rubbished her entry and actually wrote that they were only doing the contest because they’d been offered free stuff. A writer-hating misanthrope with an axe to grind could be assigned to review your book, or it could be someone who is short for time and just doesn’t ‘get’ your genre. You could get someone who reviews Airfix models and doesn’t know anything about fiction and what it’s meant to be for. You could have written a book in British or Australian English and get someone who only knows the American version. Or it could be that your book just needs work and the reviewer is giving it a chance and trying to say so as tactfully as possible. This means you could end up with two reviews like this as your item description:

The word ‘color’ dos not contian the letter U.

The author is obviously an old age pensioner who lives with many cats…

Here’s a thread that includes some of the reviews from last year’s contest. If you want to see an example of a thoroughly unprofessional, spittle-flecked ad hominem attack, go to the second page and scroll down to Megan Bostic’s post. Megan Bostic explains that she has a book contract under another name and that she has entered the contest before with favourable results.

Will comments like this help sell your book? Probably not. They say more about the reviewers as ill-informed and judgemental than they do about the book (or even the author, which isn’t what a review worth its salt is about anyway). Should idiotic reviews like this be allowed? Sure. People are entitled to their opinions. And customers looking at the reviews are likely to be intelligent enough to tell the difference between reviews from people who justify why they don’t like a book and people who are being silly or vindictive. The problem is that the item description is not the place to put reviews like this.

On to the Publishers Weekly reviews for entry to the semifinalist round. These tend to be written like summaries with snide remarks inserted. Sometimes they do unprofessional things such as making generalisations about the book’s intended audience or criticise the author rather than the writing. There’s a list of Publishers Weekly reviews from the 2011 contests shared by their authors up here.

Most of these are probably not what you’d choose to have as your item description either, but you may like to snip a short, positive statement (if there is one) from this review to quote.

Suggestion: If your entry is self published, and quite probably even if it isn’t, you need to be aware of these problems. Amazon links products together for the purposes of reviews and sometimes even product descriptions, which is usually to the benefit of the products but which can occasionally lead to nonsensical reviews. An example of this is if someone were to buy an e-book with intrusive DRM, and this person then posted a one-star review advising others not to buy it for this reason. This review also shows up in the reviews of a paperback version, and obviously here it’s not a relevant or valid review of this format. In the case of ABNA, the contest reviews go so far as to overwrite the product description on the product pages of all formats of the book. These reviews might be inappropriate, unprofessional, misspelt, etc. The ‘free’ electronic sample also displaces the genuine Kindle version of your book and makes it invisible when viewed from the paperback’s main page.

Authors of unpublished entries take note: Even data entries from pages that have been deleted seem to be able to persist in Amazon’s system and interfere with the display of other products. This means that, should you later sell your book to a publisher and see it come out a year later, the publisher’s official description and any nice professional reviews they have included may get overwritten by these hidden data fields associated with your name and title. A small publisher that publishes some of my books recently had a problem with a book being maliciously tagged ‘incest’ that ultimately resulted in the publisher having to delete the book and all its reviews and tags and republish it on Amazon. Neither you nor your publisher are likely to be very happy if this happens.

I’ve spent some time thinking about this, and the best way I’ve come up with to avoid these problems is to enter your book using a dummy title. Most likely, when you were writing the book or came up with the idea, you considered a few titles and one of them stuck. Just choose one of the other ones and go with that. If your book does end up winning, you can always ask to use your preferred title when you get cracking on preparing it for publication with your new editor. I’ve checked the rules of the contest and been unable to find anything that says you must enter your book under the title it’s sold under.

If you’re worried about the publicity generated by the contest not getting directed to the book as a buyable product, don’t be. Contest entries in my experience don’t generate any publicity in the second round and quarterfinals, and I actually found I sold fewer books during the whole course of the contest because of the problems of the missing item description and the sample showing up ahead of the real Kindle edition in searches. Unless you want to waste a lot of time playing popularity games on the ABNA forum at Amazon (and I don’t — I could be spending time with my family, working, or — let’s see — perhaps even writing!) you’re not going to accrue a hoard of reviews (that will disappear at the end of the contest anyway) and you’re not going to turn a hoard of reviews into sales and a pile of money. If you do make it to the finals and manage to generate significant publicity, you can always explain that your book is sold under another title on your website.

ABNA contests opens January 23; see here for more details.

Friday, 25 November 2011

Return of the Tax Return

Tangentrine Ltd's tax return is complete for this year. Surprisingly straightforward, HMRC and Companies House have got together to produce a single PDF application that will automatically submit your tax return to both the necessary recipients. Find out more about it on HMRC's website.

I have a few books out or coming out soon, under various names. The only one I'm publishing through my own house and will mention is Moonsteed, now out in paperback, a science-fiction adventure story with some explicit scenes of a sexual nature. It's available from Amazon and various other online vendors.

Wednesday, 13 July 2011

Episode Three: Returned Sevenfold

This month, I became 30 and Tangentrine Ltd became one year old. This means two things: dreaded middle age, and the dreaded Annual Returns. Since there's not much I can do on the former, I'm going to concentrate on the latter, and more specifically the most urgent thing you need to send back each year: the annual return to Companies House.

What is an annual return?

Separate from your tax returns to Companies House and HMRC, your annual return is some basic stats about your business, such as who owns what shares, what rights particular shareholders have, and what subject your company conducts its main business in.

What do I need to do and when do I need to do it?

You need to make your company return on or after the annual made-up date of your company. You have a deadline of a little under one month to do this; if you fail to complete it on time, you will be fined and your business can even be struck off. The easiest way is to do it online using the reminder letter Companies House sends you, which will include an authentication code. You will need to provide an email address, to which will be sent a further code. You will need the email address and both codes to access the online system. You can also download a pdf and submit your return postally, but the fee for this is £40 compared to £14 for the online option.

Is it difficult?

The main problem I had was the authentication code not working. I telephoned Companies House and it turned out this was their fault: they reset the system, which seemed to fix it. Their comments suggested this wasn't an uncommon occurrence, so if you are having this problem, you need to call the number on your reminder letter and explain the situation to them. Otherwise, the return is in the form of an online questionnaire and is not difficult to complete. It will help you to have your original IN01 form that you filled in when you set up your company to check the specifics against.